The Investor’s Edge

Many of the ideas used by the investment community are adopted from the horse track and casino betting communities. Much of the failure that has dogged the investment community is due to rocket scientist PhDs misunderstanding the successful models of plebeian punters. The use of betting as an example is not an endorsement, just history.

To understand how the securities markets work you have to look no further than the horse bookies. Bookies take the bets from the bettors. This is the first point that the public begins to misunderstand how betting, and therefore investing, works.

There are two potential misunderstandings: The first misunderstanding is assuming that each horse has a uniform probability of winning, i.e. they are all just as likely to win. The second misunderstanding is assuming that the bookie offers one to one payout odds, i.e. pays $1 for each $1 that is bet. Grasping the significance of these statements is the key to successful investing.

The bookie, equivalent to the investment bank or broker, will always make money. Always. They do this because they do not set payout odds depending on which horse they think will win, they set payout odds based on how people bet.

Continue reading

Trading Insights: Exposing the St. Petersburg Paradox

The St. Petersburg Paradox is a famous problem in probability and economics. The problem states that a coin is repeatedly flipped. The bet starts with $2. Every time a tails shows up, the bet is doubled. The first time a heads shows up the game ends and you receive the current bet from the ‘house’. The question is, how much would you pay the house for such a game?

From a probability point of view, the expected payout is infinite, and it is not hard to see why: the payout is doubled each round. This leads us to the paradox: you should be willing to pay an infinite amount to play this game. Most people would refuse to.

Continue reading

Adventures in the Money Markets: Godzilla's Return

In my post the Rise of Godzilla I explained how the UAE money markets work and the presence of a money center bank that I will call Godzilla. In my introduction I outlined a short squeeze that Godzilla had run against the whole UAE banking system, all fifty banks. In this article I will outline how a (then) midsize bank successfully fought off a bullying short squeeze by Godzilla.

Continue reading

Adventures in the Money Markets: The Rise of Godzilla

Money markets are the inter-bank market for short term borrowing and lending. Banks manage their strategic asset–liability mismatches as part of their overall long term plans for raising deposits and making loans. Short term reality however rarely tracks long term execution and tactical money market operations are necessary to mange the short term fluctuations of the balance sheet. Normally the money market desk of a treasury is considered boring, with excitement belonging to the currency desk. But once in a while a situation can develop that would challenge the most aggressive of currency dealers. This is the story of such a deal. Comfort with arithmetic is required.

Continue reading

The Future of Investment Banking in the GCC

عربي


Investment banking in the UAE in particular and the GCC in general saw an unprecedented jump in activity in the period 2003-2008. After a couple of decades of basic boom-bust IPO activity the explosion of activity in the equity markets triggered a smaller, but no less dramatic, growth of investment banking activity that saw the deployment of new investment banking teams in new stand alone institutions, as well as branches of international banks and divisions in local commercial banks. The global financial crisis that was triggered in late 2008 ended the expansion era. After six years in the doldrums there are whispers about the rebirth of investment banking. The opportunities do indeed exist but not where conventional wisdom is pointing.

The future of investment banking (IB) lies in selecting the right mix of services and business model. Services can be broadly categorized into four areas: equity capital markets (ECM), debt capital markets (DCM), mergers and acquisitions (M&A) and sales and trading (S&T). ECM basically consists of raising equity funding: IPOs and rights issues. Supporting services include a strong distribution network, the ability to underwrite offerings, which requires a large balance sheet, and S&T services to support post offering trading, in other words make sure that people can trade the new shares. DCM is similar to ECM except that it targets funds raised by debt. The supporting services are the same. A successful M&A practice, companies buying and selling other companies, really requires deep relationships with local and regional clients with a full understanding of their business. S&T requires infrastructure and a large balance sheet to allow clients to trade on margin. These descriptions are already beginning to point to a certain conclusion. Continue reading