Car Rental Industry: From Fleet Lessors to Second-Hand Car Producers

This entry is part 2 of 2 in the series Business Model Innovation

Background

For decades, the car rental industry saw itself primarily as a service provider. Cars were simply depreciating assets—bought, used, and eventually sold once their service life was over. Profitability depended on utilization rates, rental pricing, and operational efficiency.

But over time, the industry experienced a profound business model innovation: large rental companies began to see themselves not only as providers of rental services, but also as mass producers of second-hand cars.

This reframing changed the economics of the sector, reshaped supplier relationships, and redefined fleet management practices.

The Strategic Reframe

Old frame:

  • Cars = inputs, depreciating assets.

  • Value derived mainly from maximizing rental days.

  • Resale considered secondary, often after cars had been “sweated” to the end.

New frame:

  • Cars = inventory in a two-stage model: rental + resale.

  • Value derived from lifecycle economics, not just rental income.

  • Resale value became as important as rental utilization.

Continue reading

The Future of SMEs: Unlocking Global Growth with AI

This entry is part 3 of 3 in the series SME's Rising

For decades the advantage of large corporations was not only capital but also access to “better brains.” They could afford strategy consultants, marketing agencies, research labs, and legal teams. SMEs, by contrast, had to rely on intuition and grit.

Artificial intelligence is changing that equation. By compressing the cost of strategic, creative, and analytical expertise, AI is dismantling the corporate moats that once protected big business. For the first time, SMEs can access world-class capabilities at startup budgets — and compete globally on equal footing.

Continue reading

SMEs’ Exponential Growth: Riding Technology Disruptions

This entry is part 2 of 3 in the series SME's Rising

 

Every major wave of technology has arrived with the same gloomy forecast: SMEs would be crushed, jobs would disappear, and only large corporations would survive. From e-commerce to cloud, from logistics platforms to AI, the narrative was always that disruption favoured the giants.

History shows the opposite. Each disruption did not kill SMEs — it fuelled their growth. Far from being sidelined, SMEs used technology to multiply their reach, revenues, and profits.

This is the overlooked story of how SMEs turned “death knells” into exponential growth.

Continue reading

Commercial AI: Where the Real Value Will Emerge

 

Much of today’s AI debate is framed as humans versus machines. That framing misses the point. Like the internet and cloud before it, AI will settle into the background as infrastructure. The real commercial opportunity will not be in the raw models themselves but in the systems, trust mechanisms, and legitimacy markets built around them.

1. From Novelty to Infrastructure

Every technology begins as spectacle then sinks into the background. The internet was once a revolution. Today it is assumed infrastructure. Cloud computing went the same way. AI will follow.

The winners will not be those selling “AI” as a standalone product, but those embedding it into workflows. Think of:

  • AWS turning compute into platforms and services.
  • Bloomberg embedding raw data into analytics and trader workflows.
  • SAP integrating processes through ERP systems.

AI will commoditise surface outputs like text or images. The margin will shift to higher-level services that reconfigure compliance, logistics, research, etc.

2. Trust Becomes the Scarce Commodity

When content is cheap to produce then credibility becomes expensive. The internet’s information flood elevated Google, the FT, and The Economist—brands that could filter, signal, and maintain trust.

Continue reading

Global Hubs & SMEs: From Hosting Giants to Hosting Intelligence

This entry is part 8 of 8 in the series Gen-AI Erodes Business Models

For decades, global financial and commercial centers defined themselves by their ability to host the largest companies. New York, London, Tokyo, and Hong Kong became magnets for multinationals because they provided what those firms needed: access to capital, legal frameworks, professional talent, and international connectivity.

The implicit goal for cities and countries was clear: attract the giants, and the rest of the economy will benefit.

But the rise of generative AI (GAI) challenges this model. If AI truly breaks down the moats that once protected big companies, then the focus of global centers may shift dramatically from hosting giants to hosting intelligence.

Continue reading

AI and the Collapse of Business Moats

This entry is part 7 of 8 in the series Gen-AI Erodes Business Models

For decades, the equity value in corporations has rested on their ability to build and defend “moats” — structural barriers that protect profits from competition. These moats have come in many forms: scale, brand, distribution, information asymmetry, and switching costs. They created stability for incumbents and concentrated power in large, bureaucratic organizations.

Generative AI is systematically weakening these barriers. The result is not only business model erosion at the firm level but also a potential reshaping of entire economies.

 

From Scale to Individual Leverage

Scale once justified headcount. Hundreds of analysts, marketers, or designers were needed to sustain output. Now individuals and small teams can harness AI to achieve capacity that rivals entire departments.

  • Example: A two-person startup can now produce marketing campaigns, financial models, and investor presentations that previously required dozens of staff. Indie game developers using AI for art and dialogue design can compete with mid-tier studios that once relied on large teams.

Organisational scale still matters in capital-intensive industries (like manufacturing or energy), but in knowledge work it is becoming far less decisive.

From Information Asymmetry to Commoditised Knowledge

Consulting firms, data vendors, and publishers thrived by owning proprietary insights. AI undermines this advantage by synthesizing public data at scale, surfacing answers once locked inside databases or hidden behind paywalls.

  • Example: Legal AI tools such as Harvey or Casetext can draft briefs and conduct case law research at a fraction of the cost of junior associates, eroding law firms’ advantage in information-heavy tasks. Market research once requiring paid reports from Gartner or McKinsey can increasingly be replicated with AI-driven synthesis.

Knowledge is becoming less about what you own, and more about how you contextualize and apply it.

From Network Effects to Layer Inversion

Platforms like Amazon, YouTube, and Airbnb have long benefited from network effects. The more users and suppliers they attracted, the stronger their position became. Continue reading

Tariffs, Trade Deficits, and Prosperity Surpluses: Rethinking the U.S. Position in the Global Economy

This entry is part 2 of 4 in the series Tariffs

Introduction

The debate over tariffs in the United States is often framed around trade imbalances. Successive administrations have argued that persistent deficits in goods — imports consistently exceeding exports — reflect unfair competition and a loss of industrial capacity. This framing positions America as a country being taken advantage of. Yet when the lens is widened beyond bilateral trade flows to the global distribution of income and production a different picture emerges. With only around 5% of the world’s population but roughly 25% of global GDP the United States enjoys a disproportionate share of prosperity. From that perspective the “problem” of trade deficits looks less like evidence of decline and more like a natural by-product of extraordinary privilege.

Tariffs as Fiscal Tools

Tariffs are a fiscal instrument. They raise government revenue by taxing imports, while simultaneously transferring wealth from importers and consumers to the state and, indirectly, to domestic producers who gain from reduced competition. This redistribution is visible and politically attractive. For example the recent U.S. tariff on Mexican tomatoes raised costs for consumers but promised relief for Florida growers.

Economically, however, tariffs act as a negative supply shock. By making imports more expensive they increase consumer prices, disrupt supply chains, and reduce efficiency. They may stimulate some investment in protected sectors but this is often inefficient investment, guided not by comparative advantage but by political shields. Continue reading

Consulting in the Age of AI

This entry is part 6 of 8 in the series Gen-AI Erodes Business Models

Consulting has long thrived on a simple premise: firms bring external perspective, proprietary knowledge, and structured problem-solving to help organizations address complex challenges. The value of the consulting model rests on three pillars: the brand premium of trusted firms, access to proprietary databases and benchmarks, and the ability to mobilize armies of analysts to process information quickly.

But generative AI may be eroding all three.

AI as a Force-Multiplier for Clients

Consultants have justified their fees by framing problems, gathering information, and producing structured recommendations. Yet senior and mid-level managers already hold most of the operating experience that consultants spend weeks “discovering.”

With generative AI managers can now:

  • Frame insights directly: into prompts enriched with company data.
  • Test hypotheses instantly: cross-checking with public benchmarks or market analysis.
  • Generate strategic options: without needing external researchers.

In this model, AI helps clients convert tacit knowledge into structured intelligence. What once required an outside team can now be done internally faster, cheaper, and sometimes better.

Continue reading

Banks and the Utility Era

This entry is part 5 of 8 in the series Gen-AI Erodes Business Models

Banks have long enjoyed dual advantages: they not only owned the balance sheet but also owned the customer relationship. Depositors and borrowers came for safety, trust, and capital; and then stayed because switching was costly and alternatives were limited.

Fintech challenged the second advantage, but not the first. Generative AI is now pushing the erosion further.

The Irreducible Moat: Balance Sheet Trust

Despite waves of fintech innovation, large regulated banks remain irreplaceable because they own balance sheets that are:

  • Large and diversified: able to absorb shocks.
  • Equity-buffered: giving depositors confidence.
  • Regulator-backed: often explicitly by central banks.

Depositors, savers, and institutional investors continue to prefer this combination. For all the user experience innovation in fintech the fundamental preference for safety and stability means banks retain their role as systemic anchors.

Portability: Banks as Utilities

The true disruption is not replacing banks but commoditizing them.

Continue reading

Marketplaces and the Rise of AI Shopping Agents

This entry is part 4 of 8 in the series Gen-AI Erodes Business Models

Marketplaces have been one of the internet’s most successful business models. From Amazon to eBay to Alibaba they thrive by owning the consumer entry point, controlling search and discovery, and taking a cut of every transaction.

But generative AI is beginning to erode this model as well.

How Marketplaces Work Today

The traditional marketplace model depends on three pillars:

  1. Traffic Control: Consumers start their journey on the platform.
  2. Search & Discovery: The marketplace determines what products are surfaced thus shaping demand.
  3. Transaction Capture: Every sale flows through the platform, securing fees and data.

The platform’s strength lies in controlling both demand aggregation and supply access.

The AI Shopping Agent Shift

Generative AI agents change the consumer journey. Instead of searching inside Amazon or eBay, a consumer can now tell an AI: “Find me the best mid-range laptop for graphic design under $1,500.”

The agent can then:

  • Search across multiple marketplaces and independent sellers.
  • Compare prices, reviews, and delivery times.
  • Present the user with a shortlist — often with a single “best option.”

In this world, the marketplace is no longer the starting point. It becomes just one of many suppliers feeding the AI layer.

Continue reading